# Request for independent replication/falsification: reproducible in-silico + in-vivo EEG package for “Hallucinatory Domestication”

**URL:** https://community.brain-map.org/t/request-for-independent-replication-falsification-reproducible-in-silico-in-vivo-eeg-package-for-hallucinatory-domestication/4860
**Category:** Science
**Created:** [February 26, 2026, 1:54pm UTC](https://community.brain-map.org/t/request-for-independent-replication-falsification-reproducible-in-silico-in-vivo-eeg-package-for-hallucinatory-domestication/4860 "2026-02-26T13:54:02Z")
**Posts on this page:** 2
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Najih](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/6f9a4e/32.png) [@Najih](https://community.brain-map.org/u/Najih)
#### Post date: [February 26, 2026, 1:54pm UTC](https://community.brain-map.org/t/request-for-independent-replication-falsification-reproducible-in-silico-in-vivo-eeg-package-for-hallucinatory-domestication/4860/1 "2026-02-26T13:54:02Z")

</div>

Hello everyone,  
I’m Najih O. Salhab (independent interdisciplinary researcher). I’m sharing **open, fully reproducible** Zenodo packages (Jupyter notebooks + run instructions + exported outputs) and I would sincerely appreciate **independent replication and/or falsification** feedback.

**Zenodo packages (turnkey):**

1. Model: [https://zenodo.org/records/18467167](https://zenodo.org/records/18467167)

2. In-silico simulation: [https://zenodo.org/records/18480343](https://zenodo.org/records/18480343)

3. In-vivo EEG validation (Jupyter pipeline): [https://zenodo.org/records/18730779](https://zenodo.org/records/18730779?utm_source=chatgpt.com)

4. Additional theory/ML formalization link: [https://zenodo.org/records/18746670](https://zenodo.org/records/18746670)

**What I’m asking (a very concrete 30–60 min check):**

- Run the in-vivo notebook as-is and confirm whether the main reported signatures replicate (or fail).

- If you prefer, adapt the same pipeline to a different dataset/paradigm and report whether the predicted dynamical signatures hold.

Any feedback—positive **or negative** —would be extremely valuable to me. If helpful, I can provide a **one-page falsification checklist** (predicted signatures, negative controls, and explicit failure criteria) to make evaluation fast and unambiguous.

Thank you for your time.

Najih O. Salhab

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Susan.Sunkin](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/6a8cbe/32.png) [@Susan.Sunkin](https://community.brain-map.org/u/Susan.Sunkin)
#### Post date: [June 3, 2026, 4:06am UTC](https://community.brain-map.org/t/request-for-independent-replication-falsification-reproducible-in-silico-in-vivo-eeg-package-for-hallucinatory-domestication/4860/2 "2026-06-03T04:06:41Z")

</div>

Thank you for your contribution to this community forum. Your request for independent replication and/or falsification feedback is outside the scope of this community forum. Thank you.