Request for independent replication/falsification: reproducible in-silico + in-vivo EEG package for “Hallucinatory Domestication”

Science
1

Hello everyone,
I’m Najih O. Salhab (independent interdisciplinary researcher). I’m sharing open, fully reproducible Zenodo packages (Jupyter notebooks + run instructions + exported outputs) and I would sincerely appreciate independent replication and/or falsification feedback.

Zenodo packages (turnkey):

  1. Model: https://zenodo.org/records/18467167

  2. In-silico simulation: https://zenodo.org/records/18480343

  3. In-vivo EEG validation (Jupyter pipeline): https://zenodo.org/records/18730779

  4. Additional theory/ML formalization link: https://zenodo.org/records/18746670

What I’m asking (a very concrete 30–60 min check):

  • Run the in-vivo notebook as-is and confirm whether the main reported signatures replicate (or fail).

  • If you prefer, adapt the same pipeline to a different dataset/paradigm and report whether the predicted dynamical signatures hold.

Any feedback—positive or negative—would be extremely valuable to me. If helpful, I can provide a one-page falsification checklist (predicted signatures, negative controls, and explicit failure criteria) to make evaluation fast and unambiguous.

Thank you for your time.

Najih O. Salhab