Access it via the information page linked on https://portal.brain-map.org/ highlighted below. You can also access it via Atlases and Data > Brain Knowledge Platform > MapMyCells via the header menu.
Hi @rmc0106 , thank you for your interest in MapMyCells.
We currently don’t have a timeline for MapMyCells to accept and automatically convert Seurat objects as input files. However, I’ve documented your request for future consideration.
In the meantime, you can transform your existing data into a MapMyCells suitable format through a two-step process:
Transposing your cell x gene information (MapMyCells requires rows = cells, columns = genes - Seurat provides the opposite as default)
I strongly suspect that the last cell in that vignette is what you want. I, however, have no personal experience with Seurat (or really R), so I am only guessing.
I agree that that should work. If you try it and it turns out that it does NOT work, please let us know in the chat and we can update the “Creating h5ad input files in R & Python” section from the document available here: File Requirements and Limits - brain-map.org with appropriate steps.
I’ve been using MapMyCells, and it works great! I really appreciate the Allen Institute’s efforts to make this possible!
I was wondering if it is possible to run MapMyCells with non-default parameters and get prediction scores for the cluster labels—similar to what one would get by using the TransferData function and doing label transfer on Seurat? I’ve obtained cluster labels from MapMyCells but would like to gain more insights into my data.
I’m glad that you are getting good use out of MapMyCells.
I have no experience working with Seurat, so I do not know what metric it returns, but the default MapMyCells configuration should already be giving you two confidence metrics for its cell type assignments as described on this page
The CSV file will only list one of these confidence metrics, but the extended JSON file contains both the bootstrapping probability (the fraction of assignment iterations that chose the final cell type) and the average correlation (the average over all iterations of the correlation between the cell and its assigned cell type). You ought to also see runner_up_assignment, runner_up_correlation, and runner_up_probability listing the five most likely cell type assignments that weren’t chosen (assuming there are that many runners up).
Is this the kind of metric you were looking for?
If it helps to put what I said in context, the actual mapping algorithm that was run is described here
Do you still want to run MapMyCells with non-default parameters, or is this information sufficient?